About 10 years ago a little shop in LA was the first on the block with a brand new toy. None of the big boys in town were interested. Until later when they came over to see what this little custom shop was getting done on this new thing called the Frontier, made by Fuji.
It was a huge step forward in lab technology. More consistent, less waste, more custom functions – it was so cool. We were in love with all the tricks we could pull off with a Frontier. Until the new Noritsu came out and it was even more amazing! (that’s a post for another day) Basically, they are both great in their own way. In fact, we keep both because they each have a little different look and we are super picky about everything! And even though there is always a lot of talk about the Frontier, the Noritsu really carries the lion’s share of work, doing about 85% of the work here in the lab. And remember, that’s after a few hundred side by side tests….. But anyway, today is Frontier Super Geek Tech Day so let’s focus on that….
So we started out back in the day with a few Fuji Frontier 1500′s, swapped for some 2000′s, then bought a couple of 2500′s. In fact, we have changed hundreds of things along the way from software and hardware updates to glass and bulb replacements and so on. Most of the time they were things the customer would never see. Today’s change is big. Big enough for those that prefer the Frontier to notice. The truth is though, the Frontier is really only now catching up to the Noritsu, but I am not picking sides. I am just sayin..…
We’ve waited for the longest time, but we’re finally happy to introduce to you the Frontier 3000 with Digital Ice now here at RPL. The funny thing is we even waited longer to launch it since we needed to do so much testing on it… Digital Ice, or as I like to call it “wonderful magical scan cleaning” is so cool! This film cleaning software gives you a perfectly clean scan and now is working great on our latest scanner, the Frontier 3000.
First question is of course: does it “look” the same? Great question. Short answer is yes. Long answer: We have done side by side testing and found that images are a dead on match. When claiming a match you have to take into account a few things, such as the age of the light source, light tunnel, mood of operator, daily calibrations, and other maintenance. These all play a vital role and are happening all the time. We have to take it all into account everyday to make everything look right. These all lead to slight variances in a blind style scan test.
How we do a test: After the operator scans the same image on each machine, we compare the actual scan and the print to check for differences. There will be a slight difference for all the reasons listed above. But what happens next is super important.. The second step is to send the same operator back with the same film to have him try and match the scans to each other without machine modification. Because while the variance is expected, the ability to immediately match is a critical part of the test. You can’t compare it any other way. You can’t look at a different image, from a different day, or different film. It has to be the same frame. Anything else will lead you to the wrong answer. In fact the biggest difference in the way we do things here at RPL is always the people. And that’s another reminder that it’s just as much about our group in production than it is the machines. They work together to get what we want.
One more additional step is review in Photoshop to look how the color all comes together. As an example, we can’t adjust the color of a Frontier scan to look like a Noritsu scan or vice / versa. We can easily spot the difference between our Frontier and our Noritsu. The difference is the magenta. Basically the magenta works differently on each machine under certain lighting conditions. Each have a great look, they’re just a little different. I would go so far as to claim that you would see more difference in a lab to lab comparison then you would in a Frontier to Noritsu comparison. If anybody wants to do a print super battle showdown then I will bet you a doughnut that I win…. And I am on a bit of a winning streak. I think I have won the last 50 or so challenges, that’s 50 in a row my film loving friends!!! Bring it on!
But seriously, I can’t stress enough the value of the real comparison. It has to be print to print, not your screen, not our screen, not a shot from last year or even last week. You have got to go to a print from scans intended on being compared. This is the best equalizer. It’s what scans are really intended for since no monitor out there is really the same. Paper, like film, has a much more critical tolerance and control then all of the other things involved. Even though you may not print that much, testing should always include it. If you were testing in a restaurant you would taste everything, not just look at it on a plate, right?
Just to finish up all the Frontier fun, while all the stuff above may inspire you to try the Frontier, there are a few things you should take into account. First is the scan quality and structure is very different compared to the Noritsu. For example the scan size you order is about the max size print you can get. Most people are not used to a restriction like this, especially those that use the Noritsu or are recently switching to film from digital. Many people enjoy the flexibility of the Noritsu scan and will not rescan to make a album. The pattern on the Frontier scan is very distracting when the scan is upsized (see photo example). Second, and I hope you are sitting down, the turnaround time is double for the Frontier, and at peak season its sometimes longer. Third, the “large” scan option, although not the most popular, is not offered on the Frontier at all.
Here is some more little known info for you.. Giant labs that still scan film do not allow for client to client color profiles and eliminate most of the operators influence by running all images scanned or submitted for color correction through a special software. This software does not necessarily make the lab good, or bad for that matter, it makes them consistent. In most cases, consistent as a bag of McDonalds’ fries, same at every store, any time of day. They are not interested in what you are looking for, they are going for what they consider the “average” to be. And don’t forget that if you are reading this, you are not in the photo masses. You would be the exception (hey you’ve read through this novel, right?) You are the client that a giant lab does not want to deal with because you care about every image, not just the average of most images.
Like a fine restaurant, it’s not about the pots and pans or even the organic tomatoes.. It’s about the chef, thats who really makes the food an amazing experience.

Close up of scan structure - Test A

Close up of scan structure - Test B

Old Frontier vs. New Frontier Photo Credit Jose Villa